T H E E N D
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
N O ? O K A Y, H E R E ' S V I N C E . . . .
I suspect you quickly noticed that something is missing from my 2009 report. You are right! Unless you are given something to compare 31.3 mgd to, the report is useless. It needs a comparison.
Neither the City of Greensboro nor the local media will dare to publish last year’s water use. If you are new to the DAM SCAM REPORT let me explain why. The city and the media won’t release a 2009 report because they know that if they do, the first thing you will want is something to compare it to. The city does not want you to know its water sales have declined since 1995. It is being kept a secret by everyone but me.
CAUTION: If the city DOES report water use for 2009 you can be sure it will not show a history of water use.
There is a fraud and a cover-up under way. The city and the news media refuse to show you a comparison like my CHART because my CHART is "EXHIBIT A" for the municipal fraud and the cover-up.
Now, an even more illuminating report about 2009:
The City and the news media refuse to show you what the City projected for its 2009 water sales. Let's call those bogus projections "EXHIBIT B" in this fraud and cover-up.
Remember, you saw it here first! In fact, you will not see 2009’s water sales anywhere else but here at the Randleman Dam Scam! Do you think the City includes this information on its water web page? ROTFLOL
U p F O U R - T E N T H S f r o m 2 0 0 8
And about that comparison? Below is "EXHIBIT A" (my CHART). I will add 2009 shortly. Remember that 2009 was 31.3mgd. That's "up" four-tenths of an mgd from 2008.
Psssst! Guess what! The City of Greensboro is not selling enough water to pay for the Randleman Dam. Guess what that means.
Do you think the public deserves to know what's in my report? Is this information newsworthy?
No comments:
Post a Comment